Thomas Graf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I did. I think it was right, why would an allocation be necessary on > the second call to inet6_dump_fib()? The walker allocated in process > context on the first call should be reused from cb->args[0].
Continued dumps are always called under spin lock (see netlink_dump). So we need to use GFP_ATOMIC in dumpers. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
