Hello.

Due to changes to enforce checking interface bindings,
sockets did not see loopback packets bound for our local address
on our interface.

e.g.)
  When we ping6 fe80::1%eth0, skb->dev points loopback_dev while
  IP6CB(skb)->iif indicates eth0.

This patch fixes the issue by using appropriate incoming interface,
in the sense of scoping architecture.

Signed-off-by: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

diff --git a/net/ipv6/icmp.c b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
--- a/net/ipv6/icmp.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/icmp.c
@@ -549,7 +549,7 @@ static void icmpv6_notify(struct sk_buff
        read_lock(&raw_v6_lock);
        if ((sk = sk_head(&raw_v6_htable[hash])) != NULL) {
                while((sk = __raw_v6_lookup(sk, nexthdr, daddr, saddr,
-                                           skb->dev->ifindex))) {
+                                           IP6CB(skb)->iif))) {
                        rawv6_err(sk, skb, NULL, type, code, inner_offset, 
info);
                        sk = sk_next(sk);
                }
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_output.c
diff --git a/net/ipv6/raw.c b/net/ipv6/raw.c
--- a/net/ipv6/raw.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/raw.c
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ int ipv6_raw_deliver(struct sk_buff *skb
        if (sk == NULL)
                goto out;
 
-       sk = __raw_v6_lookup(sk, nexthdr, daddr, saddr, skb->dev->ifindex);
+       sk = __raw_v6_lookup(sk, nexthdr, daddr, saddr, IP6CB(skb)->iif);
 
        while (sk) {
                delivered = 1;
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ int ipv6_raw_deliver(struct sk_buff *skb
                                rawv6_rcv(sk, clone);
                }
                sk = __raw_v6_lookup(sk_next(sk), nexthdr, daddr, saddr,
-                                    skb->dev->ifindex);
+                                    IP6CB(skb)->iif);
        }
 out:
        read_unlock(&raw_v6_lock);

-- 
YOSHIFUJI Hideaki @ USAGI Project  <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG-FP  : 9022 65EB 1ECF 3AD1 0BDF  80D8 4807 F894 E062 0EEA
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to