Dennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> So if you are using exactly the same equipment, I think that only two points 
> can cause the problem:

You are optimistic :o)

> 2. Cables not fitting the requirements. I am using CAT 5e actually, but it may
> be that this is a part of the problem. Can you say something about this 
> point?

I can get a fine 100Mb/s with this equipment + poor cables (a few tens of
meters + same path as the power distribution). With this setup, negociation
takes ages though. YMMV.

[...]
> > - If it still sucks, can you try 2.6.13-rc6 ?
> Is there any known problem related to the driver with the kernel I am using? 
> Just to make sure that to drive to the shop and get the devices replaced is 
> worth it.

Apparently you use a kernel:
- on a laptop (hello suspend !);
- heavily vendor patched;
- with vmware module;
- with a wireless module (proprietary + same irq as the r8169 -> *yuck*).

Add to the mix:
- X
- some interesting file transfer application

-> There are too many unknown. Please remove whatever pcmcia card you can on
the laptop and try a 2.6.13-rc6 kernel on both hosts _without the proprietary
stuff_ loaded after boot, without X.
Do not force the media, even if it takes some time to settle down, issue
a simple ssh -c blowfish $BIG_FILE between the two hosts and report the
transfer rate (include dmesg on both hosts + vmstat 1 + cat /proc/interrupts).

You should be able to directly connect the laptop to the desktop computer
with a simple cable: the r8169 is supposed to automagically cross the
signal. I have not tried this feature with very long cables but it otherwise
works here (50cm cat5 cable allows immediate detection of the link + solid
1000Mb full duplex).

--
Ueimor
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to