On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 05:10:41PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote: > > So what do folks think we should do? I'm inclined to put > this in first, as-is, then if we can get the skb->users > variant functional we can add that in as a follow-on > patch.
Fine by me. I have a suggestion as to where fclone_ref should be though. I'd put it outside sk_buff. So when you allocate sk_buff * 2 for fast clones, make that sk_buff * 2 + atomic_t. Then you will only have to carry it around for the fast clones. Cheers, -- Visit Openswan at http://www.openswan.org/ Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
