On 7/22/05, David S. Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 23:02:03 -0300
>
> > The second one again, also at:
> >
> > rsync://rsync.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/net-2.6.14.git
>
> How is this handling properly the case where sk_prot changes?
>
> Do you remember we had that problem with socket SLAB caches,
> because of how IPV6 and IPV4 sockets can change into the other
> type? That's why we store the socket SLAB cache in there, as
> well as the sk_prot.
I think so, but that thing is so tricky at times that I'll go over
most of the patch
(re)reviewing/commenting why its safe.
> Also, would be nice to have some "do { } while (0)" for the NOP
> version of the debug macros just in case :-)
I'll do that
> The first patch doing the reqsk stuff looks fine, so I'll apply
> that and push it into the net-2.6.14 tree.
OK.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
