Fixed that too. Try again, sorry. ;-)
Gj On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 4:42 PM Sasha Alexander Romanenko <[email protected]> wrote: > Very good, thanks :) > > Though new option makes the form think there is a bug I want to report, > forcing me to answer why java editing support is broken. > > пт, 2 нояб. 2018 г. в 11:38, Geertjan Wielenga < > [email protected]>: > > > OK, start the survey again and now the option 'I do not use Java editing > > features' is included. > > > > Gj > > > > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 4:35 PM Sasha Alexander Romanenko < > [email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> I am VERY weary of skewing statistics in wrong direction like that. I > will > >> influence false positive impression on release managers, upping the > "good" > >> making the bad urgent less visible. Conversely, if I am not happy with > >> JS/PHP/DB, I now feel like I should blame those who picked "meets > >> expectation" for messing with impressions. > >> > >> пт, 2 нояб. 2018 г. в 11:31, Geertjan Wielenga > >> <[email protected]>: > >> > >> > Ah, I see. Yes, there should be an option there to indicate you're not > >> > using that part of NetBeans. > >> > > >> > I guess you should response with the choice that it meets your > >> > expectations. > >> > > >> > Gj > >> > > >> > On Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 4:27 PM Sasha Alexander Romanenko < > >> [email protected] > >> > > > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> > > How did you skip it? I cannot leave it unanswered, getting error > "This > >> > is a > >> > > required question". > >> > > > >> > > пт, 2 нояб. 2018 г. в 11:24, <[email protected]>: > >> > > > >> > > > C'mon ;) It's not a big deal. > >> > > > > >> > > > I have just skipped few of questions like that (e.g. I don't write > >> PHP > >> > at > >> > > > all) ;) > >> > > > > >> > > > Michal > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >
