One more thing:

A lot of the “establishment” support of net art comes from real life 
individuals who do good things within those systems. Such as Steve Dietz, who 
in the late 1990s and early 2000s, supported a lot of work through the Walker 
Art Center. And then Christiane Paul at the Whitney with Artport, Peter Wiebel 
at ZKM, who organized the ground breaking net condition show in 1999, where in 
fact every work was shown on its own computer at the museum with the label on 
the mouse pad. What a wild 90s concept! Then there was Max Anderson at the 
Whitney who was a big proponent of net art where the Bitstreams show took place 
and the 1999 Whitney Biennial included an exhibition of net art. And David Ross 
was doing interesting work at SFMOMA around that same dotcom period as well. So 
it’s really about individuals who make things happen within large museum 
institutions. And maybe the era as well. Since the late 1990s, the art world 
has become increasingly object oriented and trending to the art market. 

From:  <[email protected]> on behalf of dave miller
Reply-To:  NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
Date:  Wednesday, September 30, 2015 at 9:03 AM
To:  NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
Subject:  Re: [NetBehaviour] An interview with Geert Lovink

Answering my own question! This article talks about post internet art and how 
it's replaced net art...

http://www.artspace.com/magazine/interviews_features/trend_report/post_internet_art-52138

"While Net Art refers to art that uses the Internet as its medium and cannot be 
experienced any other way, post-Internet art makes the leap from the screen 
into brick-and-mortar galleries."

So the galleries/ establishment just ignored net art (anyway it's over and 
gone) but they embrace post internet art?


On 30 September 2015 at 13:56, dave miller <[email protected]> wrote:
I think Geert is probably correct though - seems to me the art "establishment" 
aren't interested in internet/ digital art, though maybe they have a different 
view of it from us on here.  The art world remains a mystery to me, so I may 
well be wrong. Thank god for Furtherfield, and I would love to know who are the 
curators 'not' scared of it.

What's the ‘post-digital’ bandwagon?

Dave

On 30 September 2015 at 13:48, Annie Abrahams <[email protected]> wrote:
don't be small, don't think sectarism
Geert is closer to "us" than most "others"
get in contact with him, explain and connect, use his critical energy

invite him to curate, to build, to discuss

xxx
Annie

On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 2:40 PM, NIKOS V <[email protected]> wrote:
I see the relevance in this approach, allthough  I have to say its allready to 
late for that criticism no?

Moreover, is he really interested in art? 

If yes, as Marc says, where are the references and the names ?

And why is Venice Biennial important?To whom????

2015-09-30 15:36 GMT+03:00 marc.garrett <[email protected]>:
    
 Hi Paul,
 
 Geert needs to be more specific and highlight the curators who are 'not' 
scared and who have been showing technical artwork such as Furtherifeld & 
others - his words are not grounded and are too absolute, they do not reflect 
reality...
 
 marc
 
 
http://conversations.e-flux.com/t/geert-lovink-on-social-media-and-the-arts/2581
 

 
 
 
"The absence at the 2015 Venice Bienale of digital arts and internet works says 
it all. Curators are afraid to admit they are clueless and continue their 
ignorant attitude towards art that deals with the digital in a direct matter 
(while checking their smart phone). Everyone jumps on the ‘post-digital’ 
bandwagon because that’s cute and safe. [...] Curators and critics are more 
than happy to embrace the race, gender, even the anthroposcene (whatever that 
is), but are blind for the techno-politics of the equipment and media they are 
using themselves so intensely. The contradictions are becoming absurd. Video 
was the last technology they had to deal with, but then it stopped."
 
— Geert Lovink
 

 
 
//
 

 
 
enjoy, 
 

 
 
-- Paul
 

 
 

 
 -- 
 
-----   |(*,+,#,=)(#,=,*,+)(=,#,+,*)(+,*,=,#)|   ---
 http://paulhertz.net/
 
 
 
  
 
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
 
 
 

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour



-- 


_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour



-- 
26 09 14h  vivre entre – from estranger to e-stranger, une conférence 
performée
festival Magdalena,  La Bulle Bleue, 285 rue du Mas de Prunet, Montpellier
aabrahams.wordpress.com/2015/09/17/vivre-entre-from-estranger-to-e-stranger/

besides, 
online performances On Object Agency 
with Martina Ruhsam
archives (text, script, video, images)
bram.org/besides/
Marc Garrett interviewed me for the Choose Your Muse series on Furtherfield
furtherfield.org/features/interviews/choose-your-muse-interview-annie-abrahams 



_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour


_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list 
[email protected] 
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to