Good conversation, And Paul, in regards to the aspect of respect from the critic, I could see that. Good call.
Greetings from the Sandpit. Patrick From: Paul Hertz <[email protected]> Reply-To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, September 15, 2015 at 8:43 PM To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity <[email protected]> Subject: [NetBehaviour] Bad review[s] So what do you do when the Distinguished Critic writes a newspaper review where he says one of your prints (in a curated gallery group show) that it "shows neither intellectual nor aesthetic spark."? Probably nothing, except post to NetBehaviour. All publicity is good publicity, right? Nevertheless, I am astounded that the moldy fig style of journalism still persists, where the critic's opinion is the subject matter of the critique. I suppose it's more entertaining than opening the work up to the reader's judgement. -- Paul -- ----- |(*,+,#,=)(#,=,*,+)(=,#,+,*)(+,*,=,#)| --- http://paulhertz.net/ _______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
_______________________________________________ NetBehaviour mailing list [email protected] http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
