On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Leo Cacciari <[email protected]>wrote:
> [ ... ]
>
> Calling netsnmp_handler_registration_free from
> netsnmp_unregister_handler can be, as I stated, either a bug or a
> feature, but in any case I think it should be advertised in the
> documentation. Anyhow, this answer my own question: yes, unregistering
> handlers is enough for avoiding memory leaks (at least those related to
> surviving handler registration structures).
>
As far as I know this is the intended behavior. But you are right, this
should be documented. I'll have a look at documenting this on the trunk
(which will become version 5.7 ?).
Bart.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4
The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly
Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run
across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Net-snmp-users mailing list
[email protected]
Please see the following page to unsubscribe or change other options:
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/net-snmp-users
