On Thu, 2 Apr 2026 12:15:37 GMT, SendaoYan <[email protected]> wrote:

>> Daisuke Yamazaki has updated the pull request with a new target base due to 
>> a merge or a rebase. The pull request now contains three commits:
>> 
>>  - Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master' into 
>> 8372325-http-client-tests-cleanup
>>    
>>    # Conflicts:
>>    # 
>> test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/HttpRequestBodyPublishers/FromPublisherTest.java
>>    # test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/HttpRequestBodyPublishers/NoBodyTest.java
>>    # 
>> test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/HttpRequestBodyPublishers/OfByteArrayTest.java
>>    # 
>> test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/HttpRequestBodyPublishers/OfByteArraysTest.java
>>    # test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/HttpRequestBodyPublishers/OfFileTest.java
>>    # 
>> test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/HttpRequestBodyPublishers/OfInputStreamTest.java
>>    # test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/HttpRequestBodyPublishers/OfStringTest.java
>>  - Update copyright year to 2026
>>  - 8372325: Refactor tests under jdk/java/net/httpclient classes to use 
>> ${test.main.class}
>
> test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/HttpClientExceptionTest.java line 42:
> 
>> 40:  * @bug 8248006
>> 41:  * @summary The test checks if UncheckedIOException is thrown
>> 42:  * @build  HttpClientExceptionTest
> 
> Hi. does `@build HttpClientExceptionTest` can replaced as `@build 
> ${test.main.class}`

I'd prefer not to touch the build clause even if that were possible

> test/jdk/java/net/httpclient/HttpClientExceptionTest.java line 43:
> 
>> 41:  * @summary The test checks if UncheckedIOException is thrown
>> 42:  * @build  HttpClientExceptionTest
>> 43:  * @run junit/othervm 
>> -Djava.nio.channels.spi.SelectorProvider=HttpClientExceptionTest$CustomSelectorProvider
> 
> Hi, does 
> `-Djava.nio.channels.spi.SelectorProvider=HttpClientExceptionTest$CustomSelectorProvider`
>  can replaced as 
> `-Djava.nio.channels.spi.SelectorProvider=${test.main.class}$CustomSelectorProvider`

Please let's not do that.

-------------

PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30307#discussion_r3027794155
PR Review Comment: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/30307#discussion_r3027789382

Reply via email to