On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 04:23:01PM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 12/19/2016 04:15 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> > gcc 4.4.7 (hello RHEL 6) complains about redefinition of typedefs,
> > as in:
> >
> > gcc -std=gnu99 -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -DSYSCONFDIR='"/usr/local/etc"' -g -O2
> > -g -O2 -MT nbd_client-buffer.o -MD -MP -MF .deps/nbd_client-buffer.Tpo -c
> > -o nbd_client-buffer.o `test -f 'buffer.c' || echo './'`buffer.c
> > buffer.c:39: error: redefinition of typedef ‘buffer_t’
> > buffer.h:31: note: previous declaration of ‘buffer_t’ was here
> >
> > The .c file only has to declare the struct being typedef'd, not
> > repeat the typedef declaration.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > buffer.c | 4 ++--
> > crypto-gnutls.c | 4 ++--
> > 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> With this patch, I was able to run 'make check' on my RHEL 6 machine,
> with its older gnutls-devel-2.12.23-17.el6.x86_64. There were two test
> failures, both related to the recent STARTTLS additions, but I don't
> have enough time or tls experience to try and debug them today. It may
> just be a bug in the testsuite, not prepared to handle the difference
> between older and modern gnutls.
I was working on finalising the TLS support last night, and there may
have been a few moments where I pushed some commits that broke the build
in similar ways. The final version should work, though.
Can you verify if the problem persists with today's git HEAD?
--
< ron> I mean, the main *practical* problem with C++, is there's like a dozen
people in the world who think they really understand all of its rules,
and pretty much all of them are just lying to themselves too.
-- #debian-devel, OFTC, 2016-02-12
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Developer Access Program for Intel Xeon Phi Processors
Access to Intel Xeon Phi processor-based developer platforms.
With one year of Intel Parallel Studio XE.
Training and support from Colfax.
Order your platform today.http://sdm.link/intel
_______________________________________________
Nbd-general mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nbd-general
