Thanks, could have figured that out on my own :)
Hannes
Am 2013-10-15 17:14, schrieb André Bargull:
Already done -->
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/community/oca-486395.html#b :-D
On 10/15/2013 5:12 PM, Hannes Wallnoefer wrote:
Sorry if this was asked before, but did you sign the OpenJDK
contributor agreement? Would you mind doing so?
http://openjdk.java.net/contribute/
That is required to adopt your patches.
Thanks,
Hannes
Am 2013-10-15 16:59, schrieb André Bargull:
(Your answer was only sent to the mailing list and I'm using digest
mode, that means I get your responses with delay... )
Sure, I understand the scheduling issues. If the changes are too
risky or if there isn't even enough time to perform risk evaluation,
they won't make it for JDK8. But posting the patches won't hurt,
will it? :-)
- André
As we are approaching towards jdk8 end game, it is better to avoid
sweeping changes at the last minute.
I think we can definitely consider these changes for post jdk8 (8
update
perhaps..).
PS. As you know, not all your previous 'fuzzer' issues have been fixed
for jdk8 - again due to time constraints.
Thanks for reporting,
-Sundar
