05.12 2004 r., on 18:35 Brad Wilson wrote: > I disagree with your take on the situation. > > This isn't "his" XML file. This is "his" Visual Studio project file, > which happens to be an XML looking thing that is occasionally not > legal XML.
Right, I did know it writtin my post. > The fact that the file is or isn't legal XML is really immaterial. The > job of the solution task is to parse Visual Studio solution and > project files, and build the software appropriately. It doesn't matter > whether Microsoft has stupidly decided to emit text that looks like > XML, but isn't. Nobody's arguing that Microsoft did the right thing, > but they did what they did, and now it's the job of the solution task > to consume that Visual Studio produces, whether that's legal XML or > not. I always thought NAnt is XML-based solution and follows XML specification. It seems I was wrong. But you have to know going this way (consuming every garbage and "non-XML XMLs") isn't an easy way and NAnt may become inconsistent and not stable working software. XML is a standard and IMHO is specified to be followed. Please take a note of that I'm not a NAnt develper and all those are my personal opinions. Best regards -- Mateusz Łoskot mateusz at loskot dot net ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/ _______________________________________________ Nant-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
