> -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Gert Driesen > Sent: woensdag 20 oktober 2004 19:38 > To: 'Ian MacLean'; 'Thibaut Barrère' > Cc: 'Nant-Users (E-mail)' > Subject: RE: [Nant-users] Readonly properties, overwrite attribute > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > > Ian MacLean > > Sent: woensdag 20 oktober 2004 18:32 > > To: Thibaut Barrère > > Cc: Nant-Users (E-mail) > > Subject: Re: [Nant-users] Readonly properties, overwrite attribute > > > > Didn't we agree to not throw this error anymore - and just > > warn as was the previous behaviour ? > > Yes, I just haven't had time yet. I'll try to get this in today.
I'll commit that change right now. > > Should we also deprecate the "overwrite" attribute on the > <property> task > (and remove it after the 0.85 release), as a > "property::exists(...)" unless > condition could be used instead ? Also, should we continue to throw a buildexception when a read-only property is overwritten using another mechanism (eg. another task) ? I'd say yes, but let me know what you think. Gert ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide on ITManagersJournal Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you think of them. Give us Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! Click to find out more http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl _______________________________________________ Nant-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
