Hi Merrill,

Sorry for the confusing email.  I tried replacing the attribute readonly with just 
read, and last night this seemed to work.  When I had a chance to look at it this 
morning I realized that the project loader was just not picking up the readonly 
attribute in my test case (and concluded the fix did not really work, the attribute 
was just being ignored).  I have changed this attribute back to readonly and checked 
in a fix to the bug.

So...if you could test your build against the next nightly build and report back what 
you find that would be great. 


Cheers,


Clayton


-----Original Message-----
From:   Merrill Cornish [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:   Tue 7/13/2004 7:23 AM
To:     Clayton Harbour; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:     
Subject:        RE: [Nant-users] <cvs-checkout> won't be "quiet"
Clayton,

>>>Replacing the attribute with read instead seems to solve this issue.  

Hmmm.  I'm not sure what you mean by replacing the "readonly" attribute with "read".  
The cvs-checkout task documentation mentions the "readonly" and "readwrite" boolean 
attributes, which sound like they are mutually exclusive (and therefore, shouldn't be 
separate attributes).

Anyway, in place of readonly="true", I tried readwrite="false", but I got this error 
message:

     'false' is not a valid value for attribute 'readwrite' of <cvs-checkout ... />.
         Exception has been thrown by the target of an invocation.
             Object reference not set to an instance of an object.

This sounds like a strange objection for a property documented as a boolean.


Merrill <CVS doesn't like me.>
  





-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 -
digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches,
unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com
_______________________________________________
Nant-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users

Reply via email to