william sez: > I think Jean's point was that since we can't know how our targets are > going to get used (i.e. depend'd or call'd), we have to > assume they will > be called (i.e. their dependencies will be run more than once). >... > not being > able to say that a call task doesn't rerun dependencies means > targets now > cannot be written in isolation, but have to be written written in the > context of their callers -- a nasty breach of encapsulation.
thank you -- if i could express myself today, that's what i would have said. -jean ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Nant-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
