oh, and just because it might need re-repeating, i too am very grateful to this community. it's a great tool, i'm heavily invested in it, and want to continue to help grow it.
/jean > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > Foley, Cash > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 12:03 > To: 'Nant-Developers (E-mail)'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: [Nant-users] nant / nant-contrib issues > > > > Not wanting to turn this into a NAnt RAnt :) > > But I have never been able to download NAntContrib and just > build it! Somehow I find it a little bit ironic that a tool > to manage builds should be so difficult to build. I have the > feeling that once they get their environment set up, the > people putting together the download don't follow the > instructions and do it from scratch to see how well it works. > And yes... I really need it to work with 1.1 and sometimes 1.0. > > But even with all that said... I'm very grateful for the > efforts that have produced NAnt and NAntContrib for basically free! > > Thanks, > > Cash > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jean Rajotte [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 10:38 AM > To: 'Nant-Developers (E-mail)'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Nant-users] nant / nant-contrib issues > > > hi yall, > > IMHO.... > > since nant's namespace was restructured , the usability and > extensibility via nant-contrib has suffered enormously, it > seems to me. it's very hard to get a good binary image > working across .NET 1.0 and 1.1. And it's hard to get a > matching source image including nant-contrib and nant -- > they're both important. > > it seems the current structure is as follows, which i believe is > problematic: > > nant source produces daily nant bin, which is available w/ > some arbitrary nant-contrib bin. nant-contrib source is > available on its own. building it depends on some arbitrary nant bin. > > i may not have gotten the above exactly, but it seems to me > nonetheless that the package visibility is backwards. what > would make sense to me would be the following: > > nant-contrib depends on nant. nothing else. > how to do this? > > when someone changes nant, they should somehow make sure they > didn't break nant-contrib. when someone gets nant > (source/bin), they only get nant (because they're not > dependent on nant-contrib) when someone gets nant-contrib > (source/bin), they get both the latest nant-contrib and the > latest nant (source/bin) because they work together. > > ? > > /jean > > ____________ > Jean Rajotte > +1 416-574-1767 > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Nant-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/n> ant-users > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > Welcome to geek heaven. > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > _______________________________________________ > Nant-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/n> ant-users > ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Nant-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
