> 
> <loadtasks path="..\foo\tasks.dll">
> </loadtasks>
> or
> <loadtasks>
> <fileset>
> <includes name="..\foo" />
> </fileset>
> </loadtasks>
> 
....
> 
> What do you guys think?

OK.  I know get the place of <loadtasks> in the story and it makes
complete sense to me.  Lose the old <taskdef>.  Man, what a dud! :)
A single file or a fileset makes sense also.
>From your example, I can't tell whether the path= attribute is for a
single file (eg: c:\lala\bob\lili\peterTask.dll") or a filespec (eg:
"c:\**bob**\*.dll" ) .  If it's the former, then the name file= would
work better IMO, just like in <copy>.  If it's the latter, then I'd
suggest sticking to the child <fileset> to alleviate confusion.



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ValueWeb: 
Dedicated Hosting for just $79/mo with 500 GB of bandwidth! 
No other company gives more support or power for your dedicated server
http://click.atdmt.com/AFF/go/sdnxxaff00300020aff/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Nant-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users

Reply via email to