It would be nice to have this control, but using exec to handle the task externally should allow people to use the latest and greatest tools.
I'm currently using that method to run my tests (Nunit-console). - Chris -----Original Message----- From: Gert Driesen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, 19 February 2003 4:57 PM To: Scott Hernandez Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Nant-users] NDoc version in distribution Hi Scott, I'm not saying we should actually always use the latest version, but when possible (and after enough testing) yes. In my opinion, we should really try to use only binary releases of other projects and work with those other teams to get bugs fixed (or functional changes introduced). We should consider NDoc as just another tool, it's not because the source is available that we should go ahead and create our own version. It should actually be possible not to include Ndoc assemblies in the NAnt distribution at all and just tell users to get version xx.xx of NDoc and copy assembly x and y to directory z. I'm not saying we should do it like that, but we should actually make this possible. For users, it should always be clear which version of NDoc, NUnit, SharpZipLib and so NAnt uses (or requires / supports). I agree that this should wait until after this release, but it's something that definitely needs attention. Thanks, Gert ----- Original Message ----- From: "Scott Hernandez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 1:27 AM Subject: Re: [Nant-users] NDoc version in distribution > Gert, > > We made some custom changes to the core and msdn documenter (I don't > know if > those changes went in to the source tree). We need to update our needs > and get the current release working for building the nant docs. This > will not work for us without a little more work as I understand it. > Ian can probably > get into the details. > > Note: When I got the latest, and build our user-docs, it produced a > blank index page. Not good. > > This will have to wait until after this release. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 9:34 PM > Subject: [Nant-users] NDoc version in distribution > > > > Hi, > > > > Is there any reason why NAnt still includes an older version (1.0x) > > of > NDoc > > in the distribution ? > > > > Is it possible to update it to at least the latest official release (1.1c) > ? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Gert > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek > > Welcome to geek heaven. > > http://thinkgeek.com/sf > > _______________________________________________ > > Nant-users mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge _______________________________________________ Nant-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SlickEdit Inc. Develop an edge. The most comprehensive and flexible code editor you can use. Code faster. C/C++, C#, Java, HTML, XML, many more. FREE 30-Day Trial. www.slickedit.com/sourceforge _______________________________________________ Nant-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users
