Colin,

To answer your question I think we will need to see your build file. It
is very possible that there is a problem with NAnt. 

Also, what version of NAnt are you using?

Thanks,
Scott
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nant-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Colin Young
> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 1:45 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [Nant-users] Interesting behaviour
> 
> I have a build file with the following target:
> 
> <target name="Debug"
>
depends="config.Debug,REXDAL.Debug,REX.BusinessObject.Debug,Utility.Debu
> g,Address.Debug,User.Debug,TestObjects.Debug,Doc.Debug"/>
> 
> The depends are listed in about the order they need to be compiled in.
> Each target however (i.e. the User.Debug target) has a proper list of
> depends. The Debug target also lists the depends in the order that
they
> appear in the build file. When I first created the file (it was merged
> from 2 files generated from slingshot), the depends were in a
different
> order than the targets appeared in the file. The interesting thing was
> the targets were getting built with the wrong output filenames: e.g.
> REX.BusinessObject.Debug produced a file called
> REX.BusinessObject.Address.dll (I confirmed by checking the
properties,
> and confirming that I had the correct AssemblyInfo.cs file in each
> directory).
> 
> Is there a problem with Nant, or have I got something wrong?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Colin
> 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> Nant-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Nant-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-users

Reply via email to