On Wed, Apr 24, 2002 at 04:39:31PM -0400, Ken Weingold wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2002, Will Yardley wrote:
> > perhaps you could explain what functionality is missing in Putty that
> > SecureCRT has? for certain functions, SecureCRT is a lot better, but for
> > many users, Putty is easier to use and provides the desired
>
> SecureCRT is just a lot more robust in pretty much every way. Session
> management I find infinitely better. One thing that pisses me off
> about Putty's is (correct me if I'm wrong) that if you make changes
> while the session is open, it doesn't give you the option to save it,
> just apply it to the current. And SCRT's mapped keys really saved my
This pissed us off as well. In fact, it made us scream and shout.
--
Ralf Hildebrandt (Im Auftrag des Referat V A) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charite Campus Virchow-Klinikum Tel. +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Referat V A - Kommunikationsnetze - Fax. +49 (0)30-450 570-916
Yesterday it worked.
Today it is not working.
Windows is like that.
