On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 01:50:23PM -0800, Ken Weingold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2002, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
> > That description isn't enough for me to have any idea what you're
> > describing. Could you make a small thread and draw (do "set ascii_chars"
> > if you want to be able to just copy and paste the index display into
> > your email) what it looks like in 1.3.24 and 1.3.27? The major change
> > between the threading in the two versions, though, is that by default
> > mutt hides missing messages, so you don't see all the question marks.
>
> Huh. This is odd. Not sure the variable here, but sometimes it acts
> as it should, and sometimes not. The same thread, even. Something like:
>
> - 5 Jan 17 Thomas Roessler ( 59) -->Re: [OT] MTA for home network
>
> - 6 Jan 17 Michael Elkins ( 5) `->Re: [OT] MTA for home network
I assume that what the above is what it looks like with 1.3.27? You
don't make it clear.
> But I guess in the other format, it would have been:
>
> - 5 Jan 17 Thomas Roessler ( 59) -->Re: [OT] MTA for home network
>
> - 6 Jan 17 Michael Elkins ( 5) -->Re: [OT] MTA for home network
No version should ever have shown it like this. If you're describing
1.3.24, I imagine that it actually looked like:
?->
`->
But I don't know. If what you mean is that the second picture is what
it looks like in 1.3.27, could you please send me a small test mailbox
demonstrating this?
Thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel E. Eisenbud
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"We should go forth on the shortest walk perchance, in the spirit of
undying adventure, never to return,--prepared to send back our embalmed
hearts only as relics to our desolate kingdoms."
--Henry David Thoreau, "Walking"
