On 2001.12.09, in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
"Matej Cepl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> However, emails in this list have mungled Reply-To: directing to
> the list. Could it be possible to ask procmail (or how to ask
> procmail) that before moving the message to the listy folder, it
> would run a message through grep -v '^Reply-To:'? And, BTW I do
> not want just
>
> :0:
> * ^TOcstex
> | grep -v '^Reply-To:' >> $MAILDIR/listy
>
> because I would like to make it to work even when I would change
> my mind and switched to maildir format. Therefore, I would
> prefer, if the actual delivery would be done by procmail.
Maybe you've already decided on another approach, but I'd do it this
way. I use essentially the same formula for some list-munging of my own.
## No ":" needed, since there's no file to lock here
:0
* ^TOcstex
{
## First rewrite the reply-to using a known, safe mail-munging
## tool. Rename (don't remove) the header so there's a record of
## this event.
:0 f
| formail -R Reply-To Old-Reply-To
## Next append to the mail folder, with locking.
:0 :
listy
}
--
-D. [EMAIL PROTECTED] NSIT University of Chicago
