Aaron Schrab <mutt> [17/08/01 03:05 -0500]:
> As has already been pointed out it's only group writeable. I don't
Bad enough :)
> Older versions of Mac OS only support HFS, so they won't work with UFS
> at all. And from what I hear some programs even have trouble running in
> OS X on UFS. As for the chmod part, I also hear that various system
> updates will reset the permissions on / .
If you don't mind not being able to run old MacOS binaries, and are careful
with your system updates and ...
Urgh. I guess I'll stick with whatever apple packages on OS X (or wait for
OS XI or OS XII).
-suresh
- Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ? Thomas Roessler
- Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ? Eugene Lee
- Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ? Chris Wong
- Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ? Aaron Schrab
- [OT] Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ? Eugene Lee
- Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- [OT] Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ? Eugene Lee
- Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ? Chris Wong
- Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ? Aaron Schrab
- Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ? Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ? Jean-Sebastien Morisset
- Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ? Seraphim Larsen
- Re: mutt porting to Max OS-X ? Eugene Lee
