Re: Word-wrap when printing and quoting

[Dirk Laurie]

Jürgen Salk skryf:
> Dirk Laurie wrote:
> 
> > signs to show that a line break was made by the viewer.  However, when
> printing or quoting (in a reply) these convenient line breaks are
> > gone, and the result looks terrible.  Can I persuade mutt to use the
> viewer-formatted version instead of the original when printing or
> > quoting?
> 
> If you edit your mails with vim, you can easily reformat the quoted lines by
> the "gq{motion}" command. E.g. "gqj" will format the current 
> line and places the cursor in the next line. Then proceed with the "."
> command. Or just type "gqG" which will reformat every line until the end. 
> 
The problem is this: by the time vim gets control, the quote sign ">"
has already been prepended to the line.  I want the line-break algorithm
to do its thing before the ">" sign gets prepended.

Dirk