Thanks for all of the feedback. The behavior isn't
exactly clear from the manual. The fact that things
are permanently changed is mentioned for folder-hook
but *not* for send-hook. IMO, it would make more
sense to have things temporary for sending mail, but
if a generic send-hook is required, then I will use that.
Josh
On Wed, Sep 01, 1999 at 09:22:33AM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 1999-08-31 18:23:23 -0400, Joshua Weage wrote:
> > If that is the case, then anything that was changed with a
> > send-hook applies to all further messages that you send until
> > another send-hook is encountered? IMO, that is a bad idea, and
> > isn't mentioned in the manual. What is the appropriate send-hook
> > to use to switch back to "normal" operation, yet still allow other
> > hooks to work properly?
>
> Though I didn't bother to check, the manual should only mention that
> you can execute configuration commands from hooks. Note that this
> does _not_ imply that these commands are local in some way.
--
- Joshua Weage <http://origin.me.gatech.edu/~weage> -
- "There is laid in the very nature of carnal man a -
- foundation for the torments of hell;" -
- - Jonathan Edwards -
