Hi Kevin, On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 11:39:17AM +0800, Kevin J. McCarthy wrote: > What I did do was a minimal implementation of the spec at the time, so that > Mutt could read messages from other clients that started sending with a > hidden Subject header, for interoperability. > > Writing was not enabled by default, but when enabled, it did send most/all > of the spec listed headers (at the time), again for interoperability. > > Doing "things" with other headers or even displaying them would open a big > can of worms, so I kept the implementation minimal on purpose.
Fair enough. > I don't have an opinion on the future direction Mutt takes here. It > wouldn't be hard to rip out the existing implementation, or to extend it. > > However, I'll just remind everyone (again) that I'm definitely on my way > out, completely, of Mutt development. I stopped being a maintainer a couple > years ago, and my time available just keeps getting less and less. :-( I > just don't have the time to participate anymore, not to mention review > patches. And fair enough. Thank you for your time! > If others really want the project to continue, it would be good for > someone(s) to start picking up the reins. If anyone does, I'll come back when this is an official RFC (maybe later this year) to send patches. :-) Have a lovely day! Alex -- <https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
