Thanks Peter. One other question: what's supposed to happen if a subject change message _is_ among the recent discussion history somewhere? Is it still supposed to send the subject at the end, coming from the MUC as the bare JID, rather than the nick of whoever issued that change?
dan On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:05 PM, Peter Saint-Andre <[email protected]> wrote: > On 12/14/11 1:03 PM, Daniel Dormont wrote: >> Right, I'm clear on how to distinguish history messages from others. >> And I realize that receiving _any_ non-history message should be a >> reliable indicator that the history has finished. But what if after >> the history comes in, there's no other message for a while? Is the >> subject message (_without_ a <delay>) the right way to identify that? > > Yes. The subject never has a delay tag. > > Granted, if we were designing this all over again, we'd fix this up so > that it was clearer. But we're not designing this all over again. :) > > Peter > > -- > Peter Saint-Andre > https://stpeter.im/ > >
