On 8/15/11 2:36 AM, Dave Cridland wrote: > On Fri Aug 12 22:46:30 2011, Peter Saint-Andre wrote: >> In the next version of XEP-0045 I'd like to standardize such a feature. >> I have a preference for the approach taken by M-Link, since it would >> allow PMs to moderators or participants even if visitors aren't allowed >> to send PMs. > > M-Link's is purely based on the sender role - I'm not sure we allow > visitors to PM anyone - including moderators - if the > x-isode#roomconfig_privmsg is set to anything other than "anyone". > > Speaking personally, and as the instigator of this config item, I'm > generally willing to consider whatever controls operators of large MUC > services think would be useful. > > So if you'd prefer to have a role-based control on the recipient, that's > fine, too.
I mis-typed. Role-based control based on the sender seems preferable to me. Peter -- Peter Saint-Andre https://stpeter.im/
