On 2011-04-26, at 9:35 AM, Kim Alvefur wrote: > On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 09:22 -0700, Curtis King wrote: >> On 2011-04-26, at 8:00 AM, Waqas Hussain wrote: >>> A session only gets its own unavailable presence, not >>> another session's. Doing it otherwise would break completely. >> So what happens when there are two live and valid sessions? Sounds >> like one won't see the other leave the room. > > Exactly, since the nick/session doesn't really leave.
Thanks that's the obvious bit I was missing. I'm sure there is some valid use case which makes it worth all the added complexity :-) ck
