> Fellows, > > >From this long conversation I cannot understand what has to be fixed. > I used long long types all the time and never had problems with them. > So, in 3.2.xx, is there anything particular to be changed? > > Cheers, > ~d >
There may or may not be a problem - the discusion so far has been about the sizes and names of the types, hopefully clearing up the definitions for some people (as it can be confusing). I don't think anyone's touched on the O/P's problem yet, which was problems converting between chars and long longs. mvh., David
