On May 21, 2013, at 3:32 AM, [email protected] (Tony Mountifield) wrote:

> Thanks Marc, yes, I have already rebased my changes to the master that
> was current yesterday evening (my evening), and there were no conflicts
> with any of the code you had already committed.

That's good to hear.  But I'm curious - do you mean, no conflicts in the sense 
that rebase just worked, or no conflicts that it was easy to do by hand?  I 
still don't have a sense of how smart these tools really are - or how much we 
should trust the results of an automatic operation like this.  Trust, but 
verify? :-)

> I've just looked through your latest pull request, and I think most
> of it shouldn't conflict, but to be safe, I'll wait until it has been
> merged (which hopefully won't take too long!), and then rebase my
> changes to that.

That would be great, thanks.  But if Werner and/or lasconic decide my changes 
need to wait for whatever reason, then you might as well submit your stuff as 
is and I will rebase to that.  It will give me an opportuity to get more 
comfortable wth this aspect of the process.  The only rebasing I've done where 
there files that actually had changes on both branches was picking up the 
"namespace ms" stuff.  But that was trivial.

Oh, and I think you're right - the new Harmony::render(QString) is a good idea.

Marc


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try New Relic Now & We'll Send You this Cool Shirt
New Relic is the only SaaS-based application performance monitoring service 
that delivers powerful full stack analytics. Optimize and monitor your
browser, app, & servers with just a few lines of code. Try New Relic
and get this awesome Nerd Life shirt! http://p.sf.net/sfu/newrelic_d2d_may
_______________________________________________
Mscore-developer mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mscore-developer

Reply via email to