Gervase Markham wrote:
>> This is the single most arrogant thing I've ever seen in here.
>
> Arrogant? Maybe. Completely true? Absolutely. Mozilla is, always has been
> and probably always will be a developers product, driven by the desires of
> the people at the codeface (or their managers ;-)
>
> Gerv
True? Maybe. Poorly phrased? Absolutely. ;) It's stuff like that that
makes people like Philip M. Jones feel like their concerns are being
ignored in favor of what developers think a browser should do, and makes
people like Ross Evans feel justified in whining and generally
irritating developers.
Developing a product for people whose requirements are driven by
end-user needs and preferences is developing a product with the end-user
in mind. Saying otherwise is just semantic meandering with no real
relevance, and only serves to alienate potential users.
