And on the seventh day Gervase Markham spoke: >The instructions for upgrading privileges should match those outlined on >http://www.gerv.net/hacking/before-you-mail-gerv.html .
Ok, I changed the numbers from 10 to 5-10 to indicate that the numbers may vary if you ask different people for a permission upgrade. >You should make a concerted effort to make the document say as little as >possible. Yesterday I went through the document and tried to shorten it a little bit without taking out any of the guidelines. It's not much but it is definitely shorter than before ;-) >> A few persons have already reviewed it, but I would appreciate it if the >> wider public would also take a look at it before I check it in on >> www.mozilla.org > >Are you sure there are not already documents on www.mozilla.org covering >this topic? Somewhere around, for example, >http://www.mozilla.org/quality/help/ ? I found http://www.mozilla.org/quality/bug-verification-guidelines.html But this document is so outdated and incomplete in comparison to this document that it should be removed (IMO) and replaced with this document. It is only linked to from http://www.mozilla.org/docs/start.html (link can be changed) and www.mozilla.org/quality/duplicate-resolved-bugs.html which is even more outdated. The doc tells you to verify duplicates from 1999. Since no other document on www.mozilla.org links to www.mozilla.org/quality/duplicate-resolved-bugs.html I think that this page should also be removed. IMO www.mozilla.org/quality badly needs some cleanup, but I will post about this later. Simon -- Rusty: You scared? Linus: You suicidal? Rusty: Only in the morning. (Ocean's Eleven) _______________________________________________ mozilla-documentation mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mozilla-documentation
