Boris Zbarsky wrote: > > > Suggested replacement: > > <li><p><strong>Use the ISO-8859-1 aka. Latin-1 character > > encoding.</strong> > > Why is this there, if I may ask? Why not use something like UTF8 > instead? If I'm authoring a Mozilla.org page and need some non-English > text on it (eg testcases for rendering or something), am I supposed to > encode every single char as an entity?
Testcases for layout are utterly exempt from the style guide. ~fantasai
