Hello Thomas, It is still on our radar, but I can't give you a definite timescale. (I assume we're talking here about having the _server_ be behind a NAT. Having the client behind a NAT works fine.) Somebody has suggested that for full-cone NATs, the server really just needs to punch through _once_ and it will continue to work as the client roams (as long as the server keeps sending packets), which if true makes the problem a lot easier!
My best recommendation for now is to do whatever you do for SSH. If you forward port 22 to your server for SSH, you will need to forward UDP ports 60000-(something higher) for Mosh as well. Best regards, Keith On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Thomas Sattler <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Keith, > > I read several requests on making 'mosh' work behind > NAT. In May you wrote "It's definitely on our radar". > > I tried Philipp Klenze's patches but couldn't make > them run. (But that might be due to a too restric- > tive firewall on one or both machines.) > > Is UDP hole-punching still a feature you're planning > to integrate in 'mosh'? > > Thomas _______________________________________________ mosh-users mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.mit.edu/mailman/listinfo/mosh-users
