The best PD our district ever had was when each elementary school had an
instructional coach and the PD was geared for that site -not district wide.
 The coaches met once a week to refine their skills as coaches -and it was
done in the manner of which Renee speaks -through talk, and sharing, and
questioning.  The district was focused on Readers' and Writers' Workshop
and for 5 years we saw a transformation in students.  They loved reading
-it was no longer a "chore of skills", and they wrote with energy and
confidence instead of in formulaic boredom.  In these years I saw the most
growth of students and they were happy and engaged in learning.  Then we
got a new superintendent who put all the coaches back in the classroom and
mandated the use of textbooks.  Scores have gone down -dramatically in
Title 1 schools, and they wonder why...

Jan
You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your
grandmother.
-Albert Einstein
"*If people are good only because they fear punishment, and hope for
reward, then we are a sorry lot indeed.*" Albert Einstein
What lies behind us and what lies before us are tiny matters compared to
what lies within us.   -Ralph Waldo Emerson
Nothing is as strong as gentleness, and nothing is so gentle as real
strength



On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 9:56 AM, Elizabeth Sledge <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Renee...amen...couldn't have said it better! I recently retired from
> teaching elementary reading (30yrs.) and was fortunate to have a principal
> who allowed me teach "outside the box". After reading mosaic of thought I
> was truly inspired to create my own innovative and comprehensive approach
> for teaching my students how to comprehend deeply using each of the key
> strategies addressed in Keene and Zimmerman's book. It took me years to
> develop a "roadmap" of how this powerful instruction would look like in a
> classroom, but I did it! I call my sytem circles of learning. Circles of
> learning not only supports and encourages students to develop each of the
> strategic behaviors and make them part of their learning schema, but also
> provides a way for students to engage in critical thinking and reflection
> through authentic reading, rich accountable talk, text coding and
> journaling. I created strategic thinking journals which are a students
> hands on tool where they
>  use writing as a means of gaining deeper analysis of text. Keeping this
> journal helps the reader notice and harvest observations and responses as
> they read by providing diverse tasks to teach, guide, reinforce and apply
> strategy use. Log term explicit strategy instruction framed around the
> gradual release model is an integral part of the instructional routine. No
> basals, text books, workbooks, ect...just authentic literature and jounals.
> My students loved getting into what I called literature learning circles to
> engage in meaningful talk about what they had read in a book using their
> journals to guide discussions. Would love to share...many teachers observed
> my classroom and are now implementing circles of learning using my
> differientiated  journals. Would love to share!
>
>
> Elizabeth Sledge
>
> On Feb 26, 2012, at 10:03 AM, Renee <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Warning.... this is long, and will appear contrary to some.
>
> There is much talk of professional development. I think the best and most
> effective professional development is teachers talking among themselves
> about what works in their classrooms. I also believe to my core that
> teachers can create their own organized ways of teaching phonics, phonemic
> awareness, etc. and that canned programs are 1. not necessary, 2.
> upside-down in their fundamental philosophical beliefs, and 3. a lovely way
> to divert classroom money to publishers.
>
> What if teachers were given time to meet every single week for an hour of
> sharing? I can't imagine any "official" professional development program
> that could do a better job. Imagine veteran teachers sharing their
> expertise with new teachers, new teachers sharing new ideas and enthusiasm,
> and the tweaking of these ideas that could happen under such circumstances.
> Teachers are not given this time. Instead, they are sent off to the
> district office or some conference where they often don't want to be, often
> don't pay that much attention because their thoughts are back in their
> classrooms, and where much time is wasted on such things as "getting to
> know each other" openers and a lot of "lecturing to" the teachers. How much
> time and money are spent/wasted on "professional development" on how to use
> the teacher's manual? Just imagine the money spent on such PD, money to the
> presenter and all the substitutes needed (and this is coming from a person
> who *does*
>  professional development and who *does* substitute, so I'm basically
> saying I am not needed!).
>
> I don't agree that we are not wired to read. I believe that we are wired
> to see and relate patterns, wired to problem-solve, wired for learning.
> What I think is that not enough time is spent in classrooms for children to
> just read. Just simply read. For those who are on their way, let them read
> and have them talk about it. For those who still aren't doing it on their
> own, there is nothing more valuable than shared / interactive writing and
> lots of time to listen to stories. In an ideal world (and yes, I know our
> world is not ideal), every child would be read to, on someone's lap, with
> the words in front of him/her. That would put them on the road to "cracking
> the code." What teachers need, IN MY OPINION, is better professional
> development on how to run a reader's workshop and writer's workshop that
> includes tons of interactive writing, opportunities to explore the language
> in a variety of ways, and plenty of time for independent reading and
> writing along
>  with individual conferencing with teachers.
>
> Amy says,
> There are only so many hours in the day.  If those of you who
> are having success with reader's workshop/ Guided Reading/ and WTW have
> insights on how you balance all of this, I'm sure many of us would love
> to hear from you.
>
> Yes, there are only so many hours in the day. In a classroom where
> children are spending more time reading and responding to that reading than
> being fed a program of systematic, explicit phonics instruction, most
> children will thrive. And yes, there will be those children who will need
> more specific direction, but it seems to me that the two main issues are
> time and trust: time for reading and writing for one's own purposes, and
> trust from the teacher that the child can do it, not without teacher help,
> but without interference in the process.
>
> In my 2nd and 3rd grade and Kindergarten classrooms, I taught all my
> phonics through the use of poetry, journal writing, interactive writing,
> independent reading, key words, and a language experience approach. Oh,
> wait.... I also used those plaid phonics workbooks in 2nd and 3rd grade....
> for homework. I didn't give lessons with them... just sent the pages home.
> Never did I spend time doing Alphafriends, Zoo Phonics, or any other kind
> of "phonics program." And guess what? No student who entered my 2nd or 3rd
> grade classroom who was labeled a "non reader" left my classroom without
> being at least very close to what was considered grade level (which these
> days seems to have been pushed down to inappropriate developmental levels).
> And nearly all my kindergarten students were "cracking the code" very well,
> thank you, by the end of kindergarten. And those who were not were well on
> their way, as evidenced by their use of phonetic principles and phonemic
>  awareness in their journal writing.
>
> In my mind, it isn't professional development in teaching phonics that
> teachers need, it is professional development in running a
> constructivist-oriented classroom, with the trust and time it takes to do
> so, that could help teachers learn to trust that most students can learn to
> crack that code by reading and writing on their own and then discussing
> that work with a teacher who can guide them within a print-rich environment
> that supports and enriches their learning.
>
> For me to explain what I did in my readers' and writers' workshop
> classroom would take about ten emails as long as this one, in order to
> explain how I used poetry, interactive writing, morning message, students'
> names, student-written books, reading at home, independent reading, book
> time, book sharing, literature circles, book chats, independent writing,
> journal writing, collaborative writing, reading the walls, and other
> strategies that can only work effectively in a print-rich environment in
> which students are given their lead and teachers are trusted to do the job.
> But I know from experience that it works, and works well.
>
> My two cents.... or I guess twenty-five cents....
> Renee Goularte
> 3rd grade, 2nd grade, kindergarten, at-risk students, ELL students, GATE
> students, art students....
>
>
> On Feb 25, 2012, at 2:48 PM, Amy McGovern wrote:
>
>
> Someone on this thread mentioned the need for on-going staff development
> in the area of phonics...I believe that all the elements of linguistics
> (phonology, morphology, syntax, semantics, English orthography,
> language development) work together when we teach reading, writing,
> spelling, and speaking.  Many of us underestimate both the importance of
> teaching phonics directly to children, especially those who are at risk
> for reading failure, and the challenge of teaching phonics
> systematically and explicitly.  'Canned' programs, no matter what we
> think of them, help us organize the explicit, systematic part of phonics
> instruction, which is incredibly important for our challenged readers.
> That is not a bad thing, in my opinion.
>
> Having said that, there
> is nothing better than a well informed teacher.   We need more
> professional development explicitly focused on the teaching of phonics,
> word study, and spelling.  Our universities need to send teachers into
> the field with this deep knowledge already in place.  How many of us
> have received formal instruction on how to successfully teach phonics?
> Phonics is often treated as a lesser skill.   But
> as others have stated, without effortless decoding skills, we can never
> really read for meaning.
>
> In my school district, I am currently
> facilitating a book study on Speech to Print, Language Essentials for
> Teachers by Louisa Moats (2nd edition).  I highly recommend this book.
> As educators we must continue to stretch what we know about the teaching
> of reading, writing, and spelling.  In many ways, this means building
> our knowledge base.  We cannot successfully teach ALL children what we
> don't deeply understand.
>
> We are not wired to read.  Cracking
> the code is a challenge for at least one-third of the students in any
> given classroom.  The more we know about how to teach phonics and word
> study, the more students will succeed.
>
> Speech to Print is a
> challenging text.  My colleagues and I are enjoying the challenge (pre-k
> through 5th grade teachers).  We are learning a lot.   The book is a
> balance of theory and practical application.  But it is not a 'how to
> book' on phonics and word study by any means.
>
> In addition, the link below is from the International
> Dyslexia Association.  The focus of this particular journal is on
> Reading Recovery.   The articles are very interesting and sight current
> research on reading instruction.  One of the articles states that
> children who receive 15 to 20 minutes of out of context word work, prior
> to their RR lesson, out performed those who did not.  I'm paraphrasing,
> but that is the main idea.
>
> http://www.onlinedigeditions.com/publication/?m=13959&l=1
>
> I
> had the opportunity to attend the International Dyslexia Associations
> national conference in November 2011.  It was outstanding.  There is
> really a wonderful movement pushing forward to merge the best of code
> based instruction, with the best of meaning based instruction, combining
> this with the most current research on the brain and how it learns to
> read.
>
> One last comment...Words their Way is certainly research
> proven.  Moats even includes the Developmental Spelling Inventory in the
> appendix of Speech to Print.  However, WTW can be difficult due to
> management issues.  It's tough to group kids for meaningful small group
> reading instruction, then bring another small group together for word
> study.  There are only so many hours in the day.  If those of you who
> are having success with reader's workshop/ Guided Reading/ and WTW have
> insights on how you balance all of this, I'm sure many of us would love
> to hear from you.
>
> Thanks for reading this.
>
> Amy McGovern
> Educational Consultant
> District Literacy Coach
> Title I Reading Teacher
> Wausau, WI
>
>
>
> From: [email protected]
> To: [email protected]
> Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2012 00:52:06 +0000
> Subject: Re: [MOSAIC] Phonics research..
>
> Gena... Can you share how you are using it and what PD was given to
> teachers??
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Feb 24, 2012, at 7:48 PM, "Gena Schuck" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I love words their way! My district is very data driven but sold on it!!
>
> Blessings,
> ~Gena~
>
> On Feb 24, 2012, at 2:49 PM, "Palmer, Jennifer" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> I will send the references for this research to the whole list when I get
> a minute.  In the Meantime, get your hands on Words Their Way. Run!!! Don't
> walk! It references many of the studies you need.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
> _______________________________________________
> Mosaic mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org
>
> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mosaic mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org
>
> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mosaic mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org
>
> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mosaic mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org
>
> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mosaic mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org
>
> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mosaic mailing list
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
> http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org
>
> Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive
>
>
_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
[email protected]
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive

Reply via email to