Seattle, April 2, 2022

 Dear MorphMetters,

       A few days ago I submitted a new manuscript, "Dimensions
 of Morphological Integration," to Benedikt Hallgrimsson's
 journal, Evolutionary Biology, where many of us have been
 publishing morphometric discussions lately.  This time,
 the website included an offer I hadn't seen before: would you
 like us to automatically submit your manuscript to Research
 Square, a free preprint posting service?  I was intrigued enough
 to agree, and indeed my complete manuscript was posted there,
 every word and every figure, yesterday evening.  You can get a copy by
 pointing your browser to

         https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1498707/v1

 and clicking on the Download PDF button.

       The piece is currently under review, and any constructive comments
 you care to send me will be taken into account if a revision is requested.
 To help you decide if you want to bother with this, here's the abstract.
 The associated list of keywords also might intrigue you:
 "integration, geometric morphometrics, Boas coordinates,
 allometry, calvaria, thin-plate spline, eigenvalues and
 eigenvectors, covariance matrix, concentration matrix, leghorn
 chickens, Vilmann data set, polar coordinates, spiderweb diagram."

        Thanks for thinking about integration, Fred Bookstein

 ======

       {\bf Abstract.}
 Over several generations of evolutionary and developmental biologists,
 ever since Olson and Miller's pioneering work of the 1950's,
 the concept of ``morphological integration''
 as applied to Gaussian representations $N(\mu,\Sigma)$
 of morphometric data has been a focus equally
 of methodological innovation and methodological perplexity.
 Reanalysis of a century-old example from Sewall Wright shows how some
 fallacies of distance analysis by correlations can be
 avoided by careful matching of the distance rosters involved
 to a different multivariate approach, factor analysis.
 I reinterpret his example by restoring the information (means and
 variances) ignored by the correlation matrix, while confirming
 what Wright called ``special size factors'' by a different
 technique, inspection of the concentration matrix $\Sigma^{-1}.$
 In geometric morphometrics (GMM), data accrue instead as
 Cartesian coordinates of labelled points; nevertheless,
 just as in the Wright example, statistical manipulations do better
 when they reconsider the normalizations that went into the
 generation of those coordinates.  Here information about both
 $\mu$ and $\Sigma,$ the means and the variances/covariances,
 can be preserved via the Boas coordinates
 (Procrustes shape coordinates without the size adjustment) that
 protect the role of size per se as an essential explanatory factor
 while permitting the analyst to acknowledge the realities of
 animal anatomy and its trajectories over time or size
 in the course of an analysis. A descriptive quantity for
 this purpose is suggested, the correlation of
 vectorized $\mu$ against the first eigenvector of $\Sigma$ for the
 Boas coordinates.  The paper reanalyzes two GMM data sets from  this
 point of view.  In one, the classic Vilmann rodent neurocranial growth data,
 a description of integration can be aligned with the purposes of
 evolutionary and developmental biology by a graphical exegesis based
 mainly in the loadings of the first Boas principal component.
 There results a multiplicity of morphometric patterns, some homogeneous and
 others characterized by gradients.  In the other, a Vienna data set
 comprising human midsagittal skull sections mostly sampled along curves,
 a further integrated feature emerges, thickening of
 the calvaria, that requires a reparametrization
 and a modified thin plate spline graphic distinct from the
 digitized configurations per se.  This new GMM protocol fulfills
 the original thrust of Olson and Miller's (1951)
 ``$\rho$F-groups,'' the alignment of statistical and
 biological explanatory guidance, while respecting the
 enormously greater range of morphological descriptors afforded
 by well-designed landmark/semilandmark configurations.

 =========

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Morphmet" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/morphmet2/20220402143440.GA2402%40shape.localdomain.

Reply via email to