I think a MooseX::Role::* module would be generally understood to be an extension of the Moose role API. Thus an actual role offered up on CPAN wouldn't have "Role" in its namespace.
-- Richard Simões Internet On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:01 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > I have written a new module along the lines of FSA::Rules, only as a Moose > Role. > > Is it convention that Moose Roles are in the MooseX::Role namespace so I > would call the module MooseX::Role::FSA::Simple, or can I call it > MooseX::FSA::Simple? > > Regards > Ian > > -- > > > > This e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential, may contain > proprietary or privileged information and is intended for the named > recipient(s) only. Unintended recipients are prohibited from taking action > on the basis of information in this e-mail and must delete all copies. > Nomura will not accept responsibility or liability for the accuracy or > completeness of, or the presence of any virus or disabling code in, this > e-mail. If verification is sought please request a hard copy. Any reference > to the terms of executed transactions should be treated as preliminary only > and subject to formal written confirmation by Nomura. Nomura reserves the > right to monitor e-mail communications through its networks (in accordance > with applicable laws). No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by > Nomura by any mistransmission of this e-mail. Any reference to "Nomura" is > a reference to any entity in the Nomura Holdings, Inc. group. Please read > our Electronic Communications Legal Notice which forms part of this e-mail: > http://www.Nomura.com/email_disclaimer.htm > >
