On Jun 8, 2010, at 8:39 AM, Chris Fields wrote:

> On Jun 8, 2010, at 12:07 AM, Chris Fields wrote:
> 
>> On Jun 7, 2010, at 10:57 PM, Jesse Luehrs wrote:
>> 
>>> On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 10:54:28PM -0500, Chris Fields wrote:
>>>> I'm seeing an odd error popping up with the latest Moose that's killing 
>>>> most of my tests.  I'm using a custom error metaclass and am seeing the 
>>>> following:
>>> 
>>> One of the changes in version 1.05 is that error metaclasses now have to
>>> inherit from Moose::Error::Default. That should probably have made it
>>> into Moose::Manual::Delta, sorry about that(:
>>> 
>>> -doy
>> 
>> Thanks doy.  Tried that and I got the same error unfortunately, but I did 
>> manage to get it to work by sticking in an explicit 
>> Class::MOP::load_class('Biome::Root::Error').  Notice I also explicitly load 
>> the meta class (Biome::Meta::Class) in the below, not doing so also causes 
>> errors (this is the Biome Moose-like sugar module):
> 
> Spoke too soon!  Now I'm seeing a brand new problem.  My custom base class 
> uses Moose directly (not my Biome sugar class) to avoid recursive 
> inheritance.  This gives the base class a default error metaclass of 
> Moose::Error::Default.  If I do something like the following bit of code, it 
> fails indicating the error metaclass doesn't match:

...

You can ignore that previous post.  After going through the code and seeing how 
overly complicated I made things, I decided to go in and dramatically simplify 
exception handling, and somehow managed to get everything working using a 
custom error metaclass.  I may go back to Exception::Class at some point, but 
it works great for now.  Thanks!

chris

Reply via email to