I like the interface, and I think it's preferable to a separate
Moose::Strict module.
However, the problem with naming the flag "strict" is the same problem
Perl has with the strict pragma. Strict is a very general name, which we'd
be using simply for strict constructors right now. That means if we want
to add _more_ types of strictness later, we're stuck with either changing
the meaning of "-strict", or adding another flag like
"-this-other-strict", both of which suck.
So with that in mind, maybe the flag needs to be more specific, like
"-strict-constructor".
We could also offer a catchall "-all-strict-i-mean-it" flag (with a better
name) that would be explicitly documented as something that could add more
strictness later.
-dave
/*============================================================
http://VegGuide.org http://blog.urth.org
Your guide to all that's veg House Absolute(ly Pointless)
============================================================*/
