YAY. By the time I get the coding part of my project conversion done I will likely have a fresh new Brubeck. I am looking forward to it. And thanks!
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:15 PM, James Dennis <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes, as mentioned before, I am literally days from bring Brubeck up to > date. It's going to change a lot so if you can hold for a couple days, it > would be very helpful. > > I'm sorry for the inconvenience... Started a new company and it has been > distracting. :) > > > On Friday, September 20, 2013, Samantha Atkins wrote: > >> And the one that pip wants to install is not the right one either. I >> ended up building it myself from the above. >> >> >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Samantha Atkins <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> Thanks for the lead. Looking into it. >> >> Another thing that screwed me up a while on this conversion is that I >> fell for the envs under the brubeck project to quickly get the >> dependencies. Several things listed there are not compatible (do not lead >> to the demos working). Also several of them are significant reversions to >> out of date versions of the packages. Particularly nasty was reverting >> pymongo to 2.1.1 when the current version is 2.6.2. I am using mongo as my >> backend so it took me a while to understand why things were currently >> breaking. I recommend that the version numbers be removed in the envs and >> only put back when specific things do not work with something more recent. >> >> The schematics package was a real pain as there are two different >> versions on github. The one at >> https://github.com/serverdensity/schematics.git works with brubeck and >> the other one does not. >> >> cheers. >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:24 PM, James Dennis <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> You might like Kracekumar's SimpleURL project. >> >> https://github.com/kracekumar/simpleurl/blob/master/README.md >> >> You are correct that Brubeck doesn't have that URL routing by default. >> Does Krace's work cover what you're looking for? >> >> This is the simplest example of using the function implementation: >> https://github.com/j2labs/brubeck/blob/master/demos/demo_noclasses.py >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Samantha Atkins <[email protected]>wrote: >> >> Cool. I was wondering why some things were added into brubeck.io. Does >> the planned work include better decorators. For instance in bottle.py I >> can do things like: >> >> @app.get('/mypath/<arg1>/<whatever>) >> def do_it(arg1, whatever): >> pass >> >> and it just works. Currently in brubeck I would have to make my own >> reqex to split out the arguments as I understand it and the one wrapper >> requires the function to have a couple of extra arguments. Or did I miss >> an easier way to do a simple wrapped function implementation for a message >> pattern? I know about subclassing brubeck classes but it seem a bit of >> hassle to create a bunch of classes for it too. >> >> I am being tempted to lift the relevant bottle implementation code and >> paste it in to brubeck.io implementation. >> >> Am I missing a better way? >> >> - samantha >> >> >> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 1:36 PM, James Dennis <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello. >> >> Brubeck actually offers the function decorators too. >> >> I am the author of Brubeck. The team and I have decided that we need to >> change some things over there, but we felt we should start with Schematics. >> We are wrapping that work up and will be dusting off Brubeck after. >> >> We intend to do a few things. First, we're going to remove the >> dependency on just about everything, except for some concurrency choice. >> That means we'll remove the dependency on Schematics. This implies the >> querysets will be removed too, which is what started the Tobin project. >> The Querysets will be in Tobin instead, and Tobin c >> >>
