Yes, as mentioned before, I am literally days from bring Brubeck up to date. It's going to change a lot so if you can hold for a couple days, it would be very helpful.
I'm sorry for the inconvenience... Started a new company and it has been distracting. :) On Friday, September 20, 2013, Samantha Atkins wrote: > And the one that pip wants to install is not the right one either. I > ended up building it myself from the above. > > > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 4:04 PM, Samantha Atkins <[email protected]>wrote: > > Thanks for the lead. Looking into it. > > Another thing that screwed me up a while on this conversion is that I fell > for the envs under the brubeck project to quickly get the dependencies. > Several things listed there are not compatible (do not lead to the demos > working). Also several of them are significant reversions to out of date > versions of the packages. Particularly nasty was reverting pymongo to > 2.1.1 when the current version is 2.6.2. I am using mongo as my backend so > it took me a while to understand why things were currently breaking. I > recommend that the version numbers be removed in the envs and only put back > when specific things do not work with something more recent. > > The schematics package was a real pain as there are two different versions > on github. The one at https://github.com/serverdensity/schematics.gitworks > with brubeck and the other one does not. > > cheers. > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:24 PM, James Dennis <[email protected]> wrote: > > You might like Kracekumar's SimpleURL project. > > https://github.com/kracekumar/simpleurl/blob/master/README.md > > You are correct that Brubeck doesn't have that URL routing by default. > Does Krace's work cover what you're looking for? > > This is the simplest example of using the function implementation: > https://github.com/j2labs/brubeck/blob/master/demos/demo_noclasses.py > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 5:08 PM, Samantha Atkins <[email protected]>wrote: > > Cool. I was wondering why some things were added into brubeck.io. Does > the planned work include better decorators. For instance in bottle.py I > can do things like: > > @app.get('/mypath/<arg1>/<whatever>) > def do_it(arg1, whatever): > pass > > and it just works. Currently in brubeck I would have to make my own reqex > to split out the arguments as I understand it and the one wrapper requires > the function to have a couple of extra arguments. Or did I miss an easier > way to do a simple wrapped function implementation for a message pattern? > I know about subclassing brubeck classes but it seem a bit of hassle to > create a bunch of classes for it too. > > I am being tempted to lift the relevant bottle implementation code and > paste it in to brubeck.io implementation. > > Am I missing a better way? > > - samantha > > > > On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 1:36 PM, James Dennis <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello. > > Brubeck actually offers the function decorators too. > > I am the author of Brubeck. The team and I have decided that we need to > change some things over there, but we felt we should start with Schematics. > We are wrapping that work up and will be dusting off Brubeck after. > > We intend to do a few things. First, we're going to remove the dependency > on just about everything, except for some concurrency choice. That means > we'll remove the dependency on Schematics. This implies the querysets will > be removed too, which is what started the Tobin project. The Querysets > will be in Tobin instead, and Tobin c > >
