> > I know what Brubeck is, i did not get your question regarding uWSGI :) >
Oh, I see. Sorry. :) > even uWSGI speaks directly via zeromq, the WSGI "layer" adds a callable. > It could hurt performance in a "hello world" benchmark, but on real > web-apps it is irrelevant. > There's two ways to think about this. If the performance difference is irrelevant, then why do the work at all? Just put nginx up with gunicorn and be done. If you need the performance increase - which I'll remind everyone is over double - then do it the right way and cut WSGI out completely. > In addition to this, WSGI is a standard (used by 99.9% of python web > frameworks and supported by brubeck too), why (albeit it is probably the > ugliest of web gateways standard) mongrel2 should ignore it ? > You haven't actually made a strong case for using Mongrel2 over nginx because you also said performance is irrelevant. If you want a reason to ignore WSGI, the reason is that WSGI sucks. If you're building the client for fun, then I can understand that. Building things is awesome.
