On Tue, 22 May 2007 10:25:32 -0700 "Kirk Haines" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 5/21/07, Zed A. Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > to be some kind of gate keeper. That let's people use GPL code all > > they want, write commercial solutions, do their own coding style, and > > use any enhancers they feel like without having to be "blessed". > > EM's license is actually the same as Ruby's license. I wasn't referring to EM but now that you bring it up, if that's true then why do I get this: eventmachine-0.7.0> grep -lr "GPL" * lib/em/deferrable.rb lib/em/eventable.rb lib/pr_eventmachine.rb lib/eventmachine_version.rb lib/eventmachine.rb lib/protocols/header_and_content.rb lib/protocols/tcptest.rb lib/protocols/httpclient.rb lib/protocols/line_and_text.rb README tests/test_hc.rb tests/test_ud.rb tests/test_ltp.rb tests/test_httpclient.rb tests/test_basic.rb tests/test_eventables.rb As well as the giant COPYING file with the whole GPL license in it. Until every last one of those statements is gone, it's GPL licensed. Even worse is the README says LGPL, the license statements on these files says GPLv2, and then everyone thinks it's Ruby licensed. You folks should do more homework before you use this stuff. -- Zed A. Shaw - Hate: http://savingtheinternetwithhate.com/ - Good: http://www.zedshaw.com/ - Evil: http://yearofevil.com/ _______________________________________________ Mongrel-users mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/mongrel-users
