Excellent work! I'm so excited about this change, as well as our other planned home panel improvements.
For those who haven't seen it, Anthony also wrote a blog post about the UX design of this feature: https://medium.com/firefox-ux/this-is-our-reading-list-c81c4238dd3d#.du5mbne3h Margaret On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Michael Comella < michael.l.come...@gmail.com> wrote: > Nice – I'm excited for these home panel mergers! > > This is a good opportunity for everyone to test if migration worked > properly: if you had any reading list items before updating, make sure > they're still around after the update. If not, file a bug. :) > - Mike > > On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Andrzej Hunt <ah...@mozilla.com> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> The reading list migration has just landed on nightly: this moves our >> former reading-list functionality into bookmarks, and lets users save >> content consistently across normal pages, and reader view pages. Reader >> view pages will still be saved offline as before, they are simply listed in >> a new location. >> >> This is still a work-in-progress, with some improvements to come (the >> metabug tracking this lives at [1]) however the basic functionality should >> be very similar: >> >> - Reader View items can be saved offline, using the bookmark star instead >> of the "add to reading list" menu items. >> >> - Saved reader view items are added to bookmarks instead of to the >> reading-list. There is a new offline indicator for saved reader view items, >> tapping on these offline bookmarks will open them directly into reader view. >> >> - All reader-view items are also listed in a "Reading List" smartfolder. >> This currently looks like a plain bookmarks folder, but it should gain a >> better icon in Bug 1246243. >> >> I'm currently looking at Bookmark Folder management (Bug 1232437 - [2]). >> This will make it easier to organise bookmarks, and is also one of the >> primary reasons for implementing the smartfolder, as the smartfolder shows >> all saved reader view items regardless of the folder they're actually saved >> in. This is most likely to land in 49 as opposed to 48. >> >> ATB, >> >> Andrzej >> >> [1] >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1234314&hide_resolved=1 >> >> [2] >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=1232437&hide_resolved=1 >> _______________________________________________ >> mobile-firefox-dev mailing list >> mobile-firefox-dev@mozilla.org >> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mobile-firefox-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > mobile-firefox-dev mailing list > mobile-firefox-dev@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mobile-firefox-dev > >
_______________________________________________ mobile-firefox-dev mailing list mobile-firefox-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mobile-firefox-dev
