We could uplift bug 1235475 to get some better stacks. The breakpad changes that we talked about in the channel meeting haven't even landed in Nightly yet, but are close.
-Brad On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Margaret Leibovic <mleibo...@mozilla.com> wrote: > Finkle also requested uplift on the patches to remove FHR, which will fix > two crashes: > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1183320 > > Margaret > > On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:48 PM, Margaret Leibovic <mleibo...@mozilla.com> > wrote: > >> We talked about the crash list in our Android triage meeting earlier >> today. >> >> Bug 760956 has speculative patches that need to land and be uplifted. >> >> We also plan to take a look at the long tail of crashes to see if there >> are easy wins there. The top crashers that we have right now have been >> around for a long time, so they're not easy problems to solve, but there >> are likely easy bugs to fix further down the list. >> >> Margaret >> >> >> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 3:45 PM, Ritu Kothari <rkoth...@mozilla.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Lawrence, >>> >>> AFAIK there are no potential uplifts that are ready to land in Beta44 to >>> address Fennec stability issues. Margaret, please correct me if I am wrong. >>> >>> I know that the team is actively investigating top crashes and provided >>> a few fixes up b8. Margaret mentioned a few bugs that are being actively >>> looked into: >>> >>> - bug 760956 (Fix needed from Fennec team) >>> - bug 1142944 (Fennec issue so far) >>> - bug 854095 (Core::Graphics issue) >>> >>> We still have a Beta10 (mobile only) planned as usual and I would be >>> happy to work with the team to uplift stability fixes if needed. >>> >>> IIUC, for Fennec 44, we do not think we will get to 100% of end-users. >>> We have to continue to investigate Fennec crashes as a high priority so as >>> to meet the release criteria for Fx45. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Ritu >>> >>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:03 PM, Lawrence Mandel <lman...@mozilla.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Ritu, >>>> >>>> We also discussed reviewing additional stability fixes that are >>>> suitable for uplift. Can you comment on what we're doing to further improve >>>> stability of the release (also a question for Margaret and Brad) and how we >>>> plan to get to 100% of our end users? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Lawrence >>>> >>>> On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Ritu Kothari <rkoth...@mozilla.com> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> Fennec stability is not meeting the release criteria established for >>>>> 44. The agreed upon criteria was a range from 2.5 - 2.8. >>>>> >>>>> According to the latest crash data, we are at 3.2 and well above the >>>>> 2.8 mark. In today's channel meeting, *we made a decision that Fennec >>>>> 44 will not be released to 100% of our end-users*. >>>>> >>>>> *Proposed plan*: On 44 release day i.e. 1/26/16, we will have a >>>>> staged rollout on play store. In other words, we will only be releasing >>>>> Fennec 44 to a small percentage of our end-users (5-15% TBD). >>>>> >>>>> *Next steps*: Please follow along the details of the "staged rollout" >>>>> in bug 1239022. We will also look into the feasibility of pushing out >>>>> security fixes (if such a need arises) in a Fennec staged rollout >>>>> scenario. >>>>> >>>>> Please let me know if there any questions/concerns. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ritu >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> release-drivers mailing list >>>>> release-driv...@mozilla.org >>>>> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/release-drivers >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> > > _______________________________________________ > mobile-firefox-dev mailing list > mobile-firefox-dev@mozilla.org > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mobile-firefox-dev > >
_______________________________________________ mobile-firefox-dev mailing list mobile-firefox-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mobile-firefox-dev
