> > I think we should do all options for max coverage. > > But, I have a strong preference for an SDK. (Note that SDK is a big word > for something that is distributed in a single source file and has a two > method API.) >
I agree with everything in this mail. My put to Bryan just now was that we should call the thing we're shipping now a "reference project", not an SDK — that'll remove a lot of confusion. I've asked Bryan to make sure bugs are on file for everything else. Here's my next question, which I guess goes to mfinkle and gerv. Can/should we make this reference project Public Domain or BSD licensed, or do we consider MPL2.0 to be loose enough that it won't impede adoption?
_______________________________________________ mobile-firefox-dev mailing list mobile-firefox-dev@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/mobile-firefox-dev
