done, all installed, gnome, openbox, ossv4 and playing music. next: get upscaling from 2channel to 5 in oss
On 2 May 2010 15:55, Jean Azzopardi <[email protected]> wrote: > Amen, bro. > pacman -Syu :P > > > On Sun, May 2, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Anton Xuereb <[email protected]>wrote: > >> And it's gone! >> >> couldn't take it anymore, backed up and formatted, back to arch >> >> >> On 2 May 2010 12:07, Anton Xuereb <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I'm backing up before i blow a fuse and throw everything out of the >>> window.. >>> >>> >>> On 2 May 2010 12:15, Daniel <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Everything worked fine especially for me, being just a simple user. >>>> What I admired most was the clean installation of AWN. >>>> >>>> Daniel >>>> >>>> >>>> On il-Ħadd, 02 ta Mej, 2010 08:52 , Ramon Casha wrote: >>>> >>>> I did an upgrade (Kubuntu) and everything worked without a hitch. >>>> >>>> >>>> Ramon Casha >>>> >>>> >>>> On 1 May 2010 22:26, Anton Xuereb <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I'm pining for arch atm... >>>>> >>>>> dont have the guts to waste time on it with pure maths coming up :/ >>>>> >>>>> On 05/01/2010 10:18 PM, Jean Azzopardi wrote: >>>>> > Ditch it and get Windows 7. >>>>> > >>>>> > Oh, wait. I mean Arch Linux :P >>>>> > Srsly, I doubt ext4 regression would give you all that problem. My >>>>> > best guess is that some stuff didn't get updated while some did. My >>>>> > dad got the same problem when he upgraded to Karmic. While everything >>>>> > upgraded, the graphics drivers didn't, and I had to do some fishing >>>>> > around. >>>>> > >>>>> > I'd recommend a fresh installation. Or Windows 7. (incidentally, I've >>>>> > been getting 1 BSOD a month :|) >>>>> > >>>>> > On Sat, May 1, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Anton Xuereb<[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> >> AHHHH Kill me, 10.04 is seriously touching the bottom for me. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> No splash screen on boot (got a corrupted one the first boot, black >>>>> screen >>>>> >> since then) >>>>> >> Alt+tab is really slow, freezing video running while it does it. >>>>> >> Video flickers when changing volume using keyboard media keys. >>>>> >> Disk performance is much worse, opening nautilus takes a good 5 >>>>> seconds. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Re-installed video driver, changed nothing. >>>>> >> Ext4 regression seems to be quite bad. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Any help or ideas before i chuck everything out of the window ? Cos >>>>> im on >>>>> >> the brink of madness :/ >>>>> >> >>>>> >> M >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On 05/01/2010 12:55 PM, Andrew Cilia wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Hi Joseph, >>>>> >> I can't say that I got much out of the upgrade. So, at this >>>>> point in >>>>> >> your thesis, why bother? >>>>> >> >>>>> >> If it ain't broke, don't fix it. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Sat, 2010-05-01 at 02:55 +0100, [email protected] wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Hi, >>>>> >> >>>>> >> I'm writing my thesis, using Sun's OpenOffice 3.2. I had to remove >>>>> the >>>>> >> default OO 3.1 in 9.04 as it had bug which wasn't allowing me to add >>>>> >> notes to documents. I followed the instructions in >>>>> >> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1404156 to install... >>>>> install >>>>> >> is OK and I have the functionality I need... >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Did anyone find any problems upgrading in this scenario? I can't >>>>> risk >>>>> >> losing lots of work and time finding out that OOO.3.2 is broken >>>>> after I >>>>> >> upgrade to 10.04 >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Cheers >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Joseph >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On 30/4/2010, "Anton Xuereb"<[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >>> The release notes are somewhat bitter sweet, seems like they >>>>> released a >>>>> >>> whole load of bugs.. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> http://www.ubuntu.com/getubuntu/releasenotes/1004 >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> On 04/30/2010 01:59 PM, Andrew Cilia wrote: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>>> I had no probs in upgrading. VMWARE patched and now fine, VPN's >>>>> fine, >>>>> >>>> gnome fine, evolution still crashing. All normal. Seeing that >>>>> nothing >>>>> >>>> feels that much different is all the more reason for me to look at >>>>> the >>>>> >>>> release notes and see what I got myself into I suppose. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> On Fri, 2010-04-30 at 02:13 +0200, Anton Xuereb wrote: >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> ok 10.04 first impressions.. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> i want my 9.10 back! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> now! >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 30 April 2010 00:04, Anton Xuereb<[email protected] >>>>> >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> upgrade process changes them again...changing them manually >>>>> worked >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 29 April 2010 23:26, Rodrick Borg<[email protected] >>>>> >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I dunno if I understood you problem exactly but to >>>>> change the >>>>> >>>>> download server: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> go to Systems -> Administration _> Software Sources >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Then change download from to a new mirror... (You can >>>>> click >>>>> >>>>> Other -> Select Best Server) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 10:03 PM, Anton Xuereb >>>>> >>>>> <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hey guys, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Im trying to do a dist-upgrade to teh latest ubuntu >>>>> >>>>> version, unfortunately the automatic updater >>>>> >>>>> (update-manager) changes the sources.list file to >>>>> point >>>>> >>>>> to the central ubuntu mirror which as you can guess >>>>> atm, >>>>> >>>>> is slower than watching paint dry. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Is there some way of forcing it to use a different >>>>> mirror >>>>> >>>>> for the upgrade ? I'd like to be ready at 2am tops. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> M >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> >>>>> MLUG-list mailing list >>>>> >>>>> [email protected]<mailto: >>>>> [email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> >>>>> MLUG-list mailing list >>>>> >>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> >>>>> MLUG-list mailing list >>>>> >>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> >>>>> >>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> The information contained in this email is confidential and may be >>>>> >>>> privileged. It is intended for the addressee only, if you are not >>>>> the >>>>> >>>> intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the email >>>>> >>>> immediately. The contents of this email must not be disclosed or >>>>> >>>> copied without the senders consent. >>>>> >>>> We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses. >>>>> >>>> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual >>>>> >>>> sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be the >>>>> >>>> view of Philip Toledo Limited >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> >>>> MLUG-list mailing list >>>>> >>>> [email protected] >>>>> >>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>>> >> MLUG-list mailing list >>>>> >> [email protected] >>>>> >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> The information contained in this email is confidential and may be >>>>> >> privileged. It is intended for the addressee only, if you are not >>>>> the >>>>> >> intended recipient please notify the sender and delete the email >>>>> >> immediately. The contents of this email must not be disclosed or >>>>> copied >>>>> >> without the senders consent. >>>>> >> We cannot accept any responsibility for viruses. >>>>> >> Any views expressed in this message are those of the individual >>>>> sender, >>>>> >> except where the sender specifically states them to be the view of >>>>> Philip >>>>> >> Toledo Limited >>>>> >> >>>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>>> >> MLUG-list mailing list >>>>> >> [email protected] >>>>> >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> _______________________________________________ >>>>> >> MLUG-list mailing list >>>>> >> [email protected] >>>>> >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>> > MLUG-list mailing list >>>>> > [email protected] >>>>> > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> MLUG-list mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> MLUG-list mailing >>>> [email protected]http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> MLUG-list mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MLUG-list mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > MLUG-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list > >
_______________________________________________ MLUG-list mailing list [email protected] http://linux.org.mt/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
