On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 04:21:38AM +0600, Denis Fateyev wrote: > Hello Gilles, > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Gilles Chehade <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This is typically the kind of fix that should be made upstream > > > > I'll wait a few hours to see if Charles is around and can tell me why we > > needed the hardlinks, then I'll clean that up > > > > Any updates on that? Though that's not a crucial issue, but I'd like to > make it more clear. >
Long story short, we install in libexec because this is the proper place when we're on a system with a mailwrapper or mailwrapper-like mechanism. But since the mailwrapper exposes programs in bin and sbin paths, a link is created to cope with that in the portable version. This needs to be fixed, but the solution is not just to remove the links and so we need to have a discussion with Charles first. We'll do that in public when he is back from wherever he is roaming :-) > BTW Any plans on the next snapshot? Can't wait for testing setproctitle() > fix for Linux, PIDs and other stuff ;) > This week-end very likely -- Gilles Chehade https://www.poolp.org @poolpOrg -- You received this email because you are subscribed to mailing list: [email protected] To unsubscribe, send mail with subject: [[email protected]] unregister
